Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eduardo Bueno v. M. Gutierrez
as 23-16004
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDUARDO BUENO
Respondent / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, named as M. Geuterez
Dennis Tourville, Jr. v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15864
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS VICTOR TOURVILLE, Jr., also named as: Dennis V Tourville and Dennis Tourville
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and RYAN THORNELL
William Fly v. Colette Peters, et al
as 23-15823
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY, named as Ms. Toni Fly
Respondent / Appellee:
COLETTE S. PETERS, Director and MARK GUTIERREZ, named Warden, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
