Cases 101 - 110 of 47,534
(PC) Bonilla v. Madera County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Madera County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01633
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. Tuolomne Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01635
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Tuolomne Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Judge Erica P. Grosjean
as 2:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Judge Erica P. Grosjean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smiley v. Schultz et al
as 2:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jerome Smiley
Defendant:
Jason Schultz and Bernadino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Shove v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
Theodore C. Shove, Sr.
Defendant:
State of California and San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge
as 2:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacque Oliphant v. Judge Eric P. Harmon et al
as 2:2024cv04820
Plaintiff:
Jacque Oliphant
Defendant:
Judge Eric P. Harmon, District Attorney Christopher Gray, Probation Officer Herman Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
