Cases 121 - 130 of 4,395
Rodriguez v. McMorris
as 2:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Vincent Edward Rodriguez
Defendant:
Skylar McMorris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Protel #349846 v. Sheffield et al
as 2:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Sebastian W Protel
Defendant:
Scott Sheffield, Andrew Evans, Bryce Myrvang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tena v. Krause
as 4:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Joshua Krause
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Armando Morales and Dora Lopez
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Ramon Vazquez, Unknown Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carrasco v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denman v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Harry Denman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, Michael Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scavelli v. Montgomery
as 2:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scavelli, III
Defendant:
Joseph G Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
Grant Gardner
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department Officer Johnny Reid, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tena v. Conover et al
as 4:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Laura Conover, Brad S Terrace and Joshua Moser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friddle v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Danny Friddle
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Todd Thomas, M Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
