Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Anthony Clarke v. A. Scribner, et al
as 09-17492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY CLARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, TORRES, D. K. STOCKMAN and others
Fateem Jackson v. M. Robinson, et al
as 09-16552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FATEEM L. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROBINSON, Correctional Officer, G. ALLEN, Correctional Sgt., P. MATZEN, Correctional Lt. and others
Woodham v. Subia et al
as 2:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gene Woodham
Defendant:
R. Subia, Dator, Stormes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Clark County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2008cv01496
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Jackson
Defendant:
Clark County Public Defenders Office, Philip Kohn and Dewayne A. Nobles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Clark County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2008cv01093
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Jackson
Defendant:
Clark County Public Defenders Office, Philip Kohn and Dewayne A. Nobles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Robinson v. Gray Davis, et al
as 08-15632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAY DAVIS, Govenor, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Gutierrez et al v. Belleque et al
as 3:2008cv00365
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Gutierrez, Gary Howard Brown, John Castro and others
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Board of Parole and Post Prison-Supervision and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Robinson et al
as 1:2007cv01699
Plaintiff:
Fateem L. Jackson
Defendant:
M. Robinson, G. Allen, P. Matzen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2007cv01414
Plaintiff:
Fateem L. Jackson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, N. Grannis, F. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
