Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PC) Bradford v. DeJesus et al
as 2:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
S DeJesus, C Hernandez, Mary Dang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cymeyon Hill v. Dang et al
as 2:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Dang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 17-17091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 16-16873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
Jimmy V. Dang v. Fulkerson et al
as 2:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dang
Defendant:
Does and Fulkerson
Wilson v. Fox et al.
as 2:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Robert W Fox, Brian Duffy, D. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Dang, et al.
as 2:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Tracy Fidel Alford
Defendant:
Lam Dang, Jones, J. Clough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Floyd v. J. Dang, et al
as 12-15967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE RENE FLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
J. DANG, Doctor, CSP Corcoran, JOHN R. CANTWELL, Doctor, CSP Corcoran and SOGGIE, Doctor, CSP Sacramento
David Ramirez v. Sheriff Deputy Rashford, et al
as 11-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RASHFORD, MARQUEZ, BOTTOMLY and others
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 11-15109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
