Cases 1 - 10 of 690
(PC) James v. Michelle et al
as 2:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Michelle and Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Fadika
as 2:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Nicolofar Fadika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Eugene, John I-V Does and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Barrett, Joseph Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Eugene Bowermaster v. Corporal Luis et al
as 2:2024cv04832
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Bowermaster
Defendant:
Corparal Luis and Deputy Navarette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windham v. Dept. of Agriculture
as 6:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Corey Eugene Windham
Defendant:
Dept. of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Benson et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Joseph Benson, L. Villegas and Megan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Dominisse et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Domimisse, Juan Corona, Isaac W. Choy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creech v. Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole, et al.
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Creech
Defendant:
Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole and Jan M. Bennetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
