Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fairbairn v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv01703
Plaintiff:
Baird Fairbairn
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Arizona, State of, Superior Court of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01967
Defendant:
Jaime Gonzalez, Arizona, State of, Maryvale Justice Court and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Ki'heem Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caraffa v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred E Caraffa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murrell v. Inmate Legal Services
as 2:2018cv01830
Plaintiff:
Antony T Murrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berg v. Maricopa County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2017cv04035
Plaintiff:
John Frank Berg
Defendant:
Maricopa County Public Defenders Office, Corwin Townsend, Maricopa Inmate Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Robert Amos Mattison
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of , C Dach and Inmate Legal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Merrick v. Inmate Legal Services et al
as 2:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Merrick
Defendant:
Inmate Legal Services , Carol Lillie , A Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Flannery v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
Robert Flannery
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. MCSO Inmate Legal Services et al
as 2:2007cv01534
Plaintiff:
Damian Dudley
Defendant:
MCSO Inmate Legal Services, B0894 and 1766
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
