Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PC) Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chavez v. Gomez et al
as 1:2020cv01684
Defendant:
A. Gomez, R. Anderson, M. Putnam and others
Plaintiff:
Moises Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Quair v. Board of Supervisors et al
as 1:2019cv00993
Defendant:
Lieutenant Timothy Day, Stacey, Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Sammy Richard Quair, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv00668
Defendant:
John & Jane Does, Heidi Miller, Christopher DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Sloan, Jr. v. D. Asuncion, et al
as 14-16406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY L. SLOAN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. ASUNCION, R. PARIN, A. DAYS and others
Lawrence Carlton Smith v. L. Stepp
as 2:2011cv02277
Defendant:
D. Battles, D. Battles, J. Cermeno and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Carlton Smith
Lawrence C Smith et al v. L Stepp et al
as 2:2010cv09850
Defendant:
D Battles, D Battles, J Cermeno and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C Smith
Brewis v. Williams et al
as 6:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jorey Lee Brewis
Defendant:
Max Williams, Mitch Morrow, Steve Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams et al
as 6:2009cv06235
Plaintiff:
John A. Brown
Defendant:
Max Williams, Robert Carrillo, M. London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Anthony v. Kenneth Stepp, et al
as 09-35431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB ANTHONY
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH STEPP, Corporal, in his individual and official capacity as an officer at the Oregon State Penitentiary and ESTHER SCHACKMAN, Corporal, in her individual and official capacity as an officer at the Oregon State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
