Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Marvin Harris, et al v. Charles Marshall, et al
as 17-17372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN HARRIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES D. MARSHALL, Warden, T. J. STEELE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director Department of Corrections and others
Sheppard v. Hood et al
as 3:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Henry Sheppard
Defendant:
Rodney G. Hood, MD, Richard E. Safrin, MD, Curtis A. McGuyer, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barstad v. Department of Corrections State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
James Barstad
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Washington, Bernard E Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Henry Charles Sr. v. James Tilton
as 2:2011cv02268
Defendant:
F. Arellano, F. Arellano, Baratto and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Charles, Sr.
William Henry Charles Sr. v. James Tilton
as 2:2010cv02619
Plaintiff:
William Henry Charles
Defendant:
James Tilton
William Charles, Sr. v. R. Drieth, et al
as 09-17424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY CHARLES, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DRIETH and J. SALAIS
William Charles, Sr. v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY CHARLES, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, MIKE MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
William Price v. T. L. Cook, et al
as 09-56169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
T. L. COOK, Captain, M. VELA and G. BAYLES
William Henry Price v. T. L. Cook, et al
as 09-56095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
T. L. COOK, D. P. CAREY, Associate Warden, R. WILSON, Correctional Officer, California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo and others
William Henry Price v. T L Cook et al
as 2:2009cv03169
Plaintiff:
William Henry Price
Defendant:
T L Cook, M Vela, G. Bayles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
