Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Donald Bone v. W. Wilson, et al
as 17-15934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. BONE
Defendant - Appellee:
W. WILSON, Warden and DAN MEYER, Assistant Warden GSMCCF
Milovan Urosevic v. Correction Corp. of America, et al
as 16-16706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILOVAN RAJKO UROSEVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, named as Correctional Corporation of America (CCA), UNKNOWN DONAHUE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Scott Cook v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-16769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT TROY COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Current Director of CDCR, F. JUAQUEZ, Current Warden at PBSP, G. D. LEWIS, Previous Warden at PBSP and others
Weaver v. Sleep Deprivation et al
as 3:2014cv04014
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Sleep Deprivation, Greg Lewis, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Warden et al
as 3:2014cv03966
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Captain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Stover et al
as 3:2014cv03967
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Stover, Warden and Assistant Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Warden et al
as 3:2014cv03970
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Captain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Sleep Deprivations et al
as 3:2014cv03835
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Sleep Deprivations, Greg Lewis, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Sleep Deprivation et al
as 3:2014cv03836
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Sleep Deprivation, Greg Lewis, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Lewis et al
as 3:2014cv03776
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Greg Lewis, Assistant Warden, Sleep Deprivations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
