Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Treandous Cotton v. Jeffery Beard, et al
as 14-15333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREANDOUS A. COTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, MATTHEW CATE and others
Sessoms v. Williamson et al
as 3:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tio Dinero Sessoms
Defendant:
J.I. Williamson, J. Crosby, S Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamos v. Grounds
as 3:2013cv06012
Plaintiff:
James George Stamos, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv05891
Plaintiff:
Treandous Cotton
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, Randy Grounds, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillingham v. Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv05777
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dillingham
Defendant:
T. Johnson, D. Moon, E. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. Grounds
as 3:2013cv04232
Plaintiff:
Lee Edward Peyton
Defendant:
Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Cate et al
as 3:2013cv03744
Plaintiff:
Treandous Cotton
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Randy Grounds, J. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James G. Stamos, Jr. v. Randy Grounds et al
as 5:2013cv00931
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Randy Grounds and David B. Long
Petitioner:
James George Stamos, Jr.
Dwight Belton v. Randy Grounds, et al
as 13-15927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT CLAYTON BELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, GIBBS, Correctional Sgt. and E. HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer
Stamos, Jr. v. Grounds et al
as 3:2013cv01484
Plaintiff:
James George Stamos, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Grounds, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and David B. Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.