Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Aguilar-Padilla v. Boydstun Equipment Manufacturing, LLC
as 3:2021cv00753
Plaintiff:
Julio Aguilar-Padilla
Defendant:
Boydstun Equipment Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Padilla v. City of Richmond
as 4:2020cv04597
Defendant:
City of Richmond
Plaintiff:
Luis Padilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez et al v. City of Brawley
as 3:2019cv00657
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gutierrez, Julio Velasquez, Raul Bernal and others
Defendant:
City of Brawley
Rios et al v. Bill Hamilton Roofing, Inc et al
as 5:2018cv03845
Plaintiff:
Joaquin V Rios , Jose Rios , Joaquin E Rios and others
Defendant:
Bill Hamilton Roofing, Inc. and Bill Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Padilla v. Oakland Pallet Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00815
Defendant:
Oakland Pallet Company, Inc. , Jose G. Padilla , Carlos Padilla and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Padilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alviso et al v. City of San Rafael
as 3:2016cv07056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Alviso , Sam Achondo , Melissa Ainsworth and others
Defendant:
City of San Rafael
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abebe et al v. Wynn Las Vegas et al
as 2:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Yan Ling Chen, Justin Abea, Jing Qian-Galarotti and others
Defendant:
Wynn Las Vegas and Steve Wynn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Mark Aragon et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05631
Plaintiff:
Mark Aragon, Anthony Ares, Cheryl Armour and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Benny Abucejo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05666
Plaintiff:
Benny Abucejo, Mario Aguilar, Phillip Alaniz, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Fredger Alexander et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05645
Plaintiff:
Christopher Landry, Timothy Stack, Ronald Cade and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
