Cases 21 - 30 of 419
Randall v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Randall
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Culps v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Culps
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
North v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keith North
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
O'Connor v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05047
Plaintiff:
Megan O'Connor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hoang v. Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Ha T. Hoang
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Suarez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Felipe Suarez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Briskey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Briskey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Ranee T Goodell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Corby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
Ricky Corby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Krebs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Nathan Krebs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
