Disability Insurance Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 423
Hugins v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff: Valery D. Hugins
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fowler v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05061
Plaintiff: Thora Fowler
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Propeck v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05063
Plaintiff: Tara Propeck
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gessel v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05038
Plaintiff: Matthew Gessel
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bauer v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff: Dallas Bauer
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tischer v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Kevin Tischer
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morales v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03396
Plaintiff: Randy Morales
Defendant: Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Neifert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff: Melvin Thomas Neifert
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Commet v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff: Mark Commet
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00191
Plaintiff: Toni Schultz
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?