Cases 11 - 20 of 39,875
Donini v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Linda A Donini
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rios v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Dessirae M Rios
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05382
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Strickland v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03002
Plaintiff:
Donna Strickland
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lorenzetta Whitfield v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04136
Plaintiff:
Lorenzetta Whitfield
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lamone Lacy v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04126
Plaintiff:
Lamone Lacey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eric R. Decker v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Eric R Decker
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Armstrong v. Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wray Hope Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05379
Plaintiff:
Smitty G Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Biekert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Madeline Biekert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
