Cases 71 - 80 of 295
Western Surety Company v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00761
Plaintiff:
Western Surety Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
United States of America v. John Doe
as 3:2016cv06658
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe
Intervenor:
Jeffrey K Berns
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Meyer v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016mc00088
Petitioner:
Joseph D Meyer
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Internal Revenue Service and Nancy Phipps
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
USA v. Wolflick & Simpson, et al
as 16-56417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WOLFLICK & SIMPSON
Defendant:
DAVID B. SIMPSON
USA v. Wolflick & Simpson, et al
as 16-56415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WOLFLICK & SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID B. SIMPSON
Chitwood v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00327
Plaintiff:
Vernon D Chitwood
Defendant:
United States of America , Tim Mussell , Carol Mussell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
McDinis Restaurant Corporation et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2016cv01159
Petitioner:
McDinis Restaurant Corporation and Benjamin Adler
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Estate of Carole Chaiken v. United States of America
as 4:2016mc80155
Petitioner:
Estate of Carole Chaiken
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Estate of Carole Chaiken v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv02490
Petitioner:
Estate of Carole Chaiken
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Jie Ci Ding et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv02414
Respondent:
Gloria Acosta, Shelly Foster, Shenita Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Jie Ci Ding and Henry Kan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
