Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Burns v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 2:2010cv00468
Plaintiff: Bradley F. Burns
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
J.E. Dunn Northwest, Inc. v. Salpare Bay, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00373
ThirdParty Defendant: 1st American Bank of Minnesota, Alaska Pacific Bancshares, Inc., American Trust & Savings Bank Whiting Indiana and others
Defendant: Associated Masonry Restoration, Inc., BankFirst, Inc., Bellingham Marine Industries, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: BankFirst, Inc., Columbia Rim Construction, Inc., Columbia Rim Corporation and others
Receiver: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Counter Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Of America
Plaintiff: J.E. Dunn Northwest, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Marion Construction Company
Amicu: Priority 1 Cleaning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Tamara C. Mendez v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00930
Defendant: DOES, Downey Savings and Loans Association, F.A., FCI Lender Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tamara C. Mendez
Sharma v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00133
Plaintiff: Satanand Sharma and The Bidya Sharma Irrevocable Trust of 1996
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and DOES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Canyon View Estates, et al v. Homeside Lending, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55065
Plaintiff - Appellant: CANYON VIEW ESTATES, a general partnership, GLORIA SEIDENGLANZ, an individual, KERRY T. SEIDENGLANZ, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee: HOMESIDE LENDING, INC., a Florida corporation, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank F.A., a savings and loan association Substituted for Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., JESSE S. HERNANDEZ, an individual and others
Traci Hepler v. California Reconveyance Compan, et al
as 10-55068
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRACI K. HEPLER
Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, F.A and others
Defendant: FIDELITY NATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., Erroneously Sued As Fidelity National Asset Management
Eliseo Yniguez, et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp
as 10-55026
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELISEO YNIGUEZ, THERESA YNIGUEZ and BARRY SOLOF, M.D., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Hicks v. Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv05619
Plaintiff: Glenn Hicks
Defendant: Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A., First Metropolitan, DSL Downey Savings and others
Receiver: U.S. Bank National Association as Successor in Interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Potashnick v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 2:2009cv01666
Plaintiff: Barbara A Potashnick and Barbara A Potashnick
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Malkov et al v. Washington Mutual Bank, FS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv04859
Plaintiff: Leonid Malkov and Maya Malkov
Defendant: Washington Mutual Bank, FS, Washington Mutual Bank, FS, Washington Mutual Bank, FS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?