Cases 51 - 60 of 256
United States of America v. Goodridge et al
as 2:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Goodridge, Jr.
Garnishee:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
United States of America v. Goodridge et al
as 2:2016cv01480
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Goodridge, Sr.
Garnishee:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
United States of America v. Tuita et al
as 3:2016cv05768
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy Tuita
Garnishee:
Solstice Group Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: James Elmer Mitchell and John "Bruce" Jessen v USA
as 2:2016mc00036
Petitioner:
James Elmer Mitchell and John Jessen
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Suleiman Abdullah Salim , Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud and Ob Aid Ullah
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. Pietrantonio et al
as 2:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Pietrantonio
Garnishee:
GE Pension Plan and GE Aviation Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Johnson v. United States
as 2:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Roland L Johnson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 925
Orrino v. United States
as 2:2016cv01271
Plaintiff:
Sonya L Orrino
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Cutright et al
as 2:2016cv01274
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew D. Cutright
Garnishee:
MacDonald-Miller Facility Solutions
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McCaw v. United States
as 3:2016cv05701
Plaintiff:
Daniel A McCaw
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Pietrantonio et al
as 2:2016cv01231
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Pietrantonio
Garnishee:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
