Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Bennett et al v. TestMax, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03662
Plaintiff:
Alvoid Bennett and Regine Urcia
Defendant:
TestMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc v. Ba Bar Farm LLC et al
as 5:2024mc00006
Plaintiff:
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc
Defendant:
Ba Bar Farm LLC and Stuart Lee Bennett
Bennett et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Tara Bennett, David Garcia and Edward Polhill
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Abarr et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Richard Caton, Juan Estrada, Anthony Hollingsworth and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation
as 3:2021md02992
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Willrich, Carlos Rodriguez, Cindy Baker and others
Defendant:
Employment Development Department for the State of California, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America, National Assocation and others
In Re:
In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett v. USAA Federal Savings Bank et al
as 3:2021cv00514
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 and USAA Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. United Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Bennett
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Bennett v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2020cv02263
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Bennett
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mario K. Bennett v. J. A. Lizarraga
as 2:2020cv10077
Plaintiff:
Mario K. Bennett
Defendant:
Warden J. A. Lizarraga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
