Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Elizabeth De Coster et al v. Newegg, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00166
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth De Coster, Maya Gold, John Mariane and others
Defendant:
Newegg, Inc.
Murphy et al v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 3:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Nancy Murphy and Robert Stewart
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. doing business as JEFFERSON HEALTH and Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shahrokh Nasseri Aghchay v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2022cv05708
Plaintiff:
Shahrokh Nasseri Aghchay
Defendant:
United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Elizabeth Murphy v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 2:2022mc00064
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Murphy
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Nicole Denise Griggs v. Cottage Health/Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv09821
Plaintiff:
Nicole Denise Griggs
Defendant:
Cottage Health/Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Goleta Cottage Hospital, Travis J. Mellon DO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Creager et al v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2021cv02101
Plaintiff:
Justin Creager, Amanda Maddeaux, Iris Corbert and others
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
United States of America v. Internet Transaction Services Inc et al
as 2:2021ms00064
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Internet Transaction Services Inc, Intertrans.com, Inc, Edward Courdy and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Murphy v. V.A. Veterans Admin.
as 3:2021cv01405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Murphy
Defendant:
V.A. Veterans Admin.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
