Environmental Matters Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Zinke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00047
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity , Defenders of Wildlife , Endangered Wolf Center and others
Defendant: Ryan Zinke, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Amy Lueders
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 18-15041
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-17547
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellant: RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Save Our Cabinets, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 17-35728
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAVE OUR CABINETS, EARTHWORKS and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHRISTOPHER S. SAVAGE, Kootenai National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: MONTANORE MINERALS CORPORATION
DOW, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 17-35713
Plaintiff - Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: LOWER YELLOWSTONE IRRIGATION PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL, SAVAGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and INTAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DOW, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35712
Plaintiff - Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant: LOWER YELLOWSTONE IRRIGATION PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL, SAVAGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and INTAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Save Our Cabinets, et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 17-35699
Plaintiff - Appellee: SAVE OUR CABINETS, EARTHWORKS and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHRISTOPHER S. SAVAGE, Kootenai National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: MONTANORE MINERALS CORPORATION
Save Our Cabinets, et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 17-35694
Plaintiff - Appellee: SAVE OUR CABINETS, EARTHWORKS and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHRISTOPHER S. SAVAGE, Kootenai National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant: MONTANORE MINERALS CORPORATION
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF ALASKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES and others
Movant - Appellant: RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
League of Conservation Voters et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff: League of Conservation Voters , Natural Resources Defense Council , Sierra Club and others
Defendant: Donald J. Trump, Ryan Zinke and Wilbur Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?