Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Reybol v. California Department of Water Resources We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05504
Plaintiff: Arcelio Joseph Reybol
Defendant: California Department of Water Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crestview Clinical Laboratory, LLC v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2023cv01913
Plaintiff: Crestview Clinical Laboratory, LLC
Defendant: u.s. department of health and human services, Xavier Becerra, U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Murkowski et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff: Frank H. Murkowski, The Southeast Conference, The City of Ketchikan and others
Defendant: Tom Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture, Xochitl Small and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Irrigation District, et al
as 23-15521
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Water Users Association, et al
as 23-15499
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES and KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Save Arnold Canal v. Arnold Irrigation District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01462
Plaintiff: Save Arnold Canal
Defendant: Arnold Irrigation District, Ronald Alvarado and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16100
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16098
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16097
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?