Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Clarke v. Meyer et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Kevin Meyer, Shelley Hughes, Tom Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crossley et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, State of California and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Discovery Petition Management LLC., Michael Crossley, PIR Data Processing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss
Ysursa v. Education Voters of Idaho, Inc., an Idaho Non-Profit Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Ben Ysursa
Defendant:
Education Voters of Idaho, Inc., an Idaho Non-Profit Corporation , Debbie Field , Phil Reberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep,, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 08-17380
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP, INC., MADERA FORD MERCURY, INC., MADERA CHEVROLET and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
THE ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTUERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Excecutive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and others
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep,, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 08-17378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP, INC., MADERA FORD MERCURY, INC., MADERA CHEVROLET and others
Plaintiff-intervenor:
THE ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTUERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Excecutive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) and INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
