Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Adams v. Baker, Jr. et al
as 2:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Adams
Defendant:
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. , John H Bowles , Terry V. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hesley v. Hecla Mining Company et al
as 1:2012cv00097
Defendant:
Hecla Mining Company, Terry V. Rogers, Charles B. Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda Hesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss v Baker et al
as 1:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
Gerald Moss
Defendant:
Phillips S. Baker, Jr., John H Bowles, Terry V. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mink v. Schlicter et al
as 2:2011cv02581
Plaintiff:
Ted Mink
Defendant:
Rose Ann Schlicter and Carole Schlicter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A Truly Electric Car Company v. Stronach et al
as 4:2011cv06578
Plaintiff:
A Truly Electric Car Company
Defendant:
Frank Stronach , Belinda Stronach , Donald Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonsall et al v. Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite PA, et al
as 2:2011cv02445
Plaintiff:
Harry Bonsall, III , Gena Bonsall , Wayne E Beck and others
Defendant:
Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite PA , LarsonAllen LLP and Unknown Parties
Intervenor:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alan D. Bird v. William W. Smith, Jr., et al
as 8:2011cv01871
Plaintiff:
Alan D Bird
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert Elliot, Samuel Gulko and others
Dublicom Limited et al v. National Merchant Center
as 2:2011cv09607
Plaintiff:
Dubli Network Limited and Dublicom Limited
Unknown:
Ted C Craig and Ted C Craig
305) 416-6887 (fax:
Christopher N Johnson and Christopher N Johnson
Defendant:
National Merchant Center
Brian Ford et al v. William W Smith Jr et al
as 8:2011cv01761
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert E Elliott, Samuel Gulko and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford and Marilyn Ford
James Bogeazis v. William W Smith Jr et al
as 8:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
James Bogeazis
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert E Elliott, Samuel Gulko and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
