Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Marks v. UMG Recordings, Inc., et al
as 22-55453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MARKS, an individual on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation and CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC
David Marks v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04043
Plaintiff:
David Marks
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc. and Capitol Records, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Graciela Beltran v. Capitol Records, LLC, et al
as 13-15695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACIELA BELTRAN, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC and EMI MUSIC, INC.
Dale Bozzio v. EMI Group Limited, et al
as 13-15685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE BOZZIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EMI GROUP LIMITED, CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, EMI MUSIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC and others
Tavares et al v. Capitol Records, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv03059
Plaintiff:
Ralph Vierra Tavares , Arthur Paul Tavares , Feliciano Vierra Tavares and others
Defendant:
Capitol Records, LLC , EMI Group Limited, EMI Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bozzio v. EMI Group Limited et al
as 4:2012cv02421
Plaintiff:
Dale Bozzio
Defendant:
EMI Group Limited, Capitol Records LLC , EMI Music North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Beltran v. EMI Music, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
Graciela Beltran
Defendant:
EMI Music, Inc. and Capitol Records, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Felice Catena v. Capitol Records LLC
as 2:2012cv00806
Defendant:
Capitol Records LLC
Plaintiff:
Felice Catena
Arista Records LLC et al
as 6:2008cv06190
Plaintiff:
Arista Records LLC, Arista Records LLC, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant:
Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
