Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Moyes et al v. United Western Bank et al
as 2:2010cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jerry C Moyes and Vickie Moyes
Defendant:
United Western Bank , Alaska Pacific Bank , BankWest Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
F&N Enterprises, et al. v. First State Bank, et al.
as 3:2009cv08175
Plaintiff:
F&N Enterprises
Defendant:
First State Bank, First State Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
First State Bank and First State Bank
Counter Defendant:
F&N Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
F & N Enterprises dba Northern Arizona Signs and Grahpics, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insuranc Corporation as Receiver for First State Bank
as 2:2009cv02045
Plaintiff:
F & N Enterprises dba Northern Arizona Signs and Grahpics, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insuranc Corporation as Receiver for First State Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Frontline Processing Corp. v. First State Bank of Eldorado,, et al
as 09-35166
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
FRONTLINE PROCESSING CORP., a Nevada corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
FIRST STATE BANK OF ELDORADO, ELDORADO, ILLINOIS, an Illionois corporation
Third-party-defendant - Appellant:
LMA UNDERWRITING AGENCY, INC. and CHRISTOPHER L. KITTLER
Frontline Processing Corp. v. First State Bank of Eldorado,, et al
as 08-35879
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
FRONTLINE PROCESSING CORP., a Nevada corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
FIRST STATE BANK OF ELDORADO, ELDORADO, ILLINOIS, an Illionois corporation
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
LMA UNDERWRITING AGENCY, INC. and CHRISTOPHER L. KITTLER
United States of America v. Shick
as 1:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chad Shick and First State Bank of Forsyth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
