Cases 11 - 20 of 3,091
Denneroll Holdings Pty Limited et al v. Chirolux LLC
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Denneroll Holdings Pty Limited and Denneroll Industries International Pty Limited
Defendant:
ChiroLux LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Atm Shafiqul Khalid and Xencare Software Inc
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Microsoft Corporation v. Khalid et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Atm Shafiqul Khalid, Xencare Software, Inc. and Xencare Software Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Westerkamp v. Benita's Inc
as 3:2024cv05278
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Finn Westerkamp
Defendant:
Benita's Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Polaris Images Corp v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Polaris Images Corp
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McGlynn v. Giant Freakin Robot LLC
as 3:2024cv05385
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Giant Freakin Robot LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Yang v. News Anchored LLC
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
News Anchored LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Savannah Intellectual Property LLC v. Holt Group Inc
as 3:2024cv05215
Plaintiff:
Savannah Intellectual Property LLC
Defendant:
Holt Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Voltstar Technologies Inc v. Tozo Inc
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Voltstar Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Tozo Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nightingale v Kottkamp Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Nightingale
Defendant:
Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
