Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 250
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-55000
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-57230
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant - Appellant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC. and HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC
Kenneth Blue v. William James Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv09202
Defendant: William James Adams, Jr, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Blue
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case
as 11-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Angus Richardson et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 2:2011cv03567
Defendant: A and M Records, Inc., Frank Colucci, Geffen Records, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Angus Richardson and Hamish Richardson
Ebony Latrice Batts et al v. William Adams, Jr. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv08123
Defendant: William Adams, Jr., Cherry River Music Co., EMI April Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ebony Latrice Batts and Manfred Mohr
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv01656
Defendant: Cherry River Music Co, EMI April Music Inc, Stacy Ferguson and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Pringle
Arc Music, Inc. v. Wayne Henderson, Sr., et al
as 10-55644
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: ARC MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, AKA Third Story Music, Inc.
Counter-claimant: RELAXED MUSIC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: WAYNE HENDERSON, Sr., an individual
Counter-defendant - Appellee: INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc., UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Counter-defendant: ALBERT JOHNSON, individually and professionally known as PRODIGY, CURTIS JAMES JACKSON, III, individually and professionally known as 50 CENT, MARY JANE BLIGE, an individual and professionally known as MARY J BLIGE and others
Arista Music et al v. Time Warner, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01662
Defendant: A Very Good Production, Crazy Monkey, Inc., Telepictures Productions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Arista Music, Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation and others
Unknown: John W Peterson, John W Peterson, John W Peterson and others
Flowers v. Interscope Records, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv04388
Plaintiff: Joseph Flowers
Defendant: Interscope Records, Inc. and Universal Music Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?