Cases 61 - 70 of 86
American Apparel Inc v. American Basics Stores West Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05922
Plaintiff:
American Apparel Inc
Defendant:
American Basics Stores West Inc, Morris Cohen and Does
J2F Productions Inc., et al v. Jason Sarrow
as 11-55681
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
J2F PRODUCTIONS INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
JASON SARROW, an individual, DBA E.E. Morris Presents, DBA ICP Films
Counter-defendant - Appellant:
DOUGLAS JACOBSON, an individual
Lang et al v. Morris
as 3:2011cv01366
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Lang , Noboru Miyajima , Manuel Sirgo Alvarez and others
Defendant:
S. Morris
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lunada Biomedical v. Todd Morris et al
as 2:2011cv02134
Defendant:
Does and Todd Morris
Plaintiff:
Lunada Biomedical
Morris Reese v. Verizon California, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01934
Defendant:
ATandT West and Verizon California, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Morris Reese
AutoEnginuity LLC v. Morris
as 2:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
AutoEnginuity LLC
Defendant:
Sean Morris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Koelsch v. Stoneman et al
as 2:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
Robert E Koelsch
Defendant:
Mark Stoneman , Stanford Stoneman , Edith Stoneman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Philip Morris USA Inc v. Joselina Bran Lopez et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Defendant:
Carmen Bautista, Ignacio Z Diaz, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Morris USA Inc
Philip Morris USA Inc v. Webvipshopping.com International Co Ltd et al
as 8:2011cv00268
Defendant:
Bosun International Trade Corp, Cheap-marlborocigarettes.com, Chinacigarette.com and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Morris USA Inc
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC et al v. Morris et al
as 1:2010cv00758
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and BR IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Dean Morris and Paradise Endeavors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
