Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pathak v. Fuller et al
as 2:2017cv01571
Defendant:
Chris Fuller, Meatmansteaks.com and The Saint Petersburg Company
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pathak v. Knigin et al
as 2:2016cv02206
Defendant:
Advansiv, Inc, Advansiv.com, Broadleaf Game Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pathak v. Yahoo, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02124
Defendant:
AOL Inc., Microsoft, Inc, Specialty Meats and Gourmet LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pathak v. Exotic Meat Market, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00368
Defendant:
Exotic Meat Market, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Harry and David v. Anshu Pathak
as 11-35716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HARRY AND DAVID, an Oregon corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
ANSHU PATHAK
Anshu Pathak v. Omaha Steaks International Inc et al
as 2:2010cv07054
Defendant:
Does and Omaha Steaks International Inc
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Anshu Pathak v. United States Patent and Trademark Offices et al
as 5:2010cv00489
Defendant:
Does, Google Inc and United States Patent and Trademark Offices
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Omaha Steaks International, Inc. v. Anshu Pathak et al
as 2:2009cv02854
Plaintiff:
Omaha Steaks International, Inc., Omaha Steaks International, Inc. and Omaha Steaks International, Inc.
Defendant:
Anshu Pathak and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Harry and David v. Pathak
as 1:2009cv03013
Plaintiff:
Harry and David, Harry and David and Harry and David
Defendant:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation v. Pathak
as 1:2008cv03101
Plaintiff:
Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation and Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation
Defendant:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
