Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. PIV Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Mike's Novelties, Inc.
Defendant:
PIV Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Travel Assets, Inc. et al v. Novelty, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
TRAVEL ASSETS, INC., Gregg Gorski and Travel Assets, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Smokebuddy
Defendant:
Novelty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. Eyce, LLC
as 6:2020cv01754
Plaintiff:
Mike's Novelties, Inc.
Defendant:
Eyce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Mikes Novelties, Inc. v. Eyce, LLC
as 2:2020cv07207
Defendant:
Eyce, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mikes Novelties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Trade West, Inc. v. Forum Novelties, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00411
Plaintiff:
Trade West, Inc.
Defendant:
Forum Novelties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Luminence, LLC v. Windy City Novelties Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Luminence, LLC
Defendant:
Windy City Novelties Inc. and Chemical Light, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Luminence, LLC v. Windy City Novelties Inc.
as 3:2016cv01548
Plaintiff:
Luminence, LLC
Defendant:
Windy City Novelties Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Solo Industries, Inc. v. Mike s Novelties, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00351
Defendant:
Manisch Chander, Mike s Novelties Inc, Mike s Worldwide Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Solo Industries, Inc.
Lightuptoys.com, LLC v. Imperial Toy, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv07219
Defendant:
Imperial Toy LLC and Rhode Island Novelty Inc
Plaintiff:
LightUpToys.Com LLC
Jake Lee v. Mike's Novelties, Inc., et al
as 12-56153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAKE LEE, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKE'S NOVELTIES, INC., a Texas Corporation, DBA Mike's Worldwide Imports and MANISCH CHANDER, an individual, AKA Mike Chander, AKA Manisch Chandra, AKA Mike Chandra
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
