Cases 1 - 10 of 1,081
Lainez v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv05256
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Lainez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maldonado v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01304
Plaintiff:
John Manuel Maldonado
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Ranee T Goodell and Ranee Terese Goodell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Matson v O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Wesley A Matson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schaus v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gregory Schaus
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Francis Joe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Krebs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Nathan Krebs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richardson
as 5:2024cv03734
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hazel Primous PR firm LLC v. Gail S Ennis et al
as 2:2024cv05252
Plaintiff:
Hazel Primous PR firm LLC
Defendant:
Gail S Ennis, Martin O'Malleys, Yolanda Benetiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Suarez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Felipe Suarez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
