Cases 11 - 20 of 20
USA v. Jose Mendez
as 14-50112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO MENDEZ, AKA Jose Mendez
USA v. Fidel Mendez
as 13-30170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FIDEL ANTONIO MENDEZ
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Arcko
as 2:2012cv01587
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Antonio Mendez Arcko
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Arcko et al
as 2:2012cv01046
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Antonio Mendez Arcko and Espamex LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Walter Mendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-71563
Petitioner:
WALTER ANTONIO MENDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Hector Mendez-Montoya v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72455
Petitioner:
HECTOR ANTONIO MENDEZ-MONTOYA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Juan Quintanillo
as 09-50531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN ANTONIO QUINTANILLO, AKA Antonio Mendez, AKA Mauricio Mendez, AKA Mauricio Guerrero
Jennifer Day et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv05725
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Day, H. D. and Jennifer K. Day
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, The City of Los Angeles Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mendez et al
as 8:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Mendez and EL Chilango Restraunt
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Antonio Mendez
as 2:2007cv07673
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
