Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Zeitlin v. Wetenhall
as 23-4035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ZEITLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
NATALIE M. WETENHALL
Simon, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3997
Petitioner:
ANNOVE SIMON, NATALIE JEAN and SOFIA SIMON-JEAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miranda-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1412
Petitioner:
NATALY ESTEFANY MIRANDA-CRUZ and KEVIN ELIAN MIRANDA-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chicas Mendez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1136
Petitioner:
KAREN NATALI CHICAS MENDEZ and ALEXIS ALEJANDRO GARCIA CHICAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bergman v. Caribou Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Ron Bergman
Defendant:
Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Rachel E. Haurwitz, Jason V. O'Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Todd R.G. Hill et al v. The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Defendant:
Hector Candelario Pena Ramirez, Jessica Viramontes, The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. G. Hill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Greenhalgh v. Caribou Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Doug Greenhalgh
Defendant:
Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Rachel E. Haurwitz, Jason V. O'Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gomez-Pineda, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1825
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRA MARIELA GOMEZ-PINEDA and NATALI VALERIA GOMEZ-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Natalie Tristan v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 8:2022cv01183
Plaintiff:
Natalie Tristan
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Natalie and Destiny Enterprises Limited Liability Company v. Chiou et al
as 5:2022cv03563
Plaintiff:
Natalie and Destiny Enterprises Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
Pierson Chiou and South Bay Medical Imaging Group LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
