Cases 11 - 20 of 491
Simon, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1025
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SIMON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DAVID BARBER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANA BLOCK and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and PAUL MIYAMOTO, In his official capacity as San Francisco Sheriff
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv01553
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso In his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Dos Santos-De Souza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-829
Petitioner:
SIMONE DOS SANTOS-DE SOUZA and MARIA ANTONIA LIMA DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Simon
as 1:2024mc00019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Agustin D. Simon
United States of America v. Simon
as 1:2024mc00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Agustin D. Simon
Not Yet Classified:
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company
Simon et al v. Strand et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ronald P Simon and Teresa J Simon
Defendant:
Doris Strand, Wayne Janke and Jayn Crouchaine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Kumar, et al. v. Koester, et al.
as 23-4363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNIL KUMAR and PRAVEEN SINHA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOLENE KOESTER, in her official capacity as Chancellor of California State University, LARRY ADAMSON, DIANA AGUILAR-CRUZ and others
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10748
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC;, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
