Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16091
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16093
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
United States of America et al v. Bridger Pipeline LLC
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of North Dakota
Defendant:
Bridger Pipeline LLC and Belle Fourche Pipeline Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of California et al v Wheeler
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner:
National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Robert Swint v. Oregon State Hospital, et al
as 21-35375
Defendant / Appellee:
AM BEST, AMTRAK, 62 BILLION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
