Cases 11 - 20 of 1,150
Anderson v. Ravalli County Sheriff, et al.
as 24-2100
Plaintiff:
MARK E. ANDERSON
Defendant:
RAVALLI COUNTY SHERIFF, TODD BOHLING, POLLY ANDERSON and others
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Kenneth K. Henderson v. Irvine Unified School District
as 5:2024cv00476
Defendant:
Randy Walker, Janet Walker, Irvine Unified School District and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth K. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NM LLC et al v. Keller et al
as 3:2024cv05181
Plaintiff:
NM LLC, Marcia A Nikolich, Steven J NIkolich and others
Defendant:
Sherri L Keller, Terry Ellson, Keller-Ellson, a general partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Terry Fabricant et al v. Pro Source Lending Group LLC
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant and Isaac Santiago
Defendant:
Pro Source Lending Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols et al v. eHealthInsurance Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06720
Plaintiff:
Terri Nichols and Thomas Matthews
Defendant:
eHealthInsurance Services, Inc. doing business as eHealth
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 23-4077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
United States of America v. Schneider
as 23-3899
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER, II
Spencer v. Lewis, et al.
as 23-3784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE R. SPENCER
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD LEWIS, Yakama Tribal Council Chairman, GEORGE MENINICK, SR., Yakama Tribal Council Vice-Chairman, CHARLENE TILLEQUOTS, Yakama Tribal Council Secretary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
