Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Shree Shiva, LLC v. City of Redding, et al
as 21-17003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHREE SHIVA, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF REDDING, DEBRA WRIGHT, JAMES WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
BUILDING ADVENTURES, INC. and RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD
Ward Weaver, Jr. v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARD FRANCIS WEAVER, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Eric Weaver v. Ron Gregory, et al
as 21-35324
Defendant / Appellee:
RON GREGORY, individually and as Acting Chief of Police for Warm Springs Police Department, ALYSSA MACY, individually and as Chief Operation Officer for Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs and CARMEN SMITH, individually and as Public Safety Manager for Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WEAVER, an individual
Bowers et al v. Denali State Bank et al
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Dena' Nena' Henash, First National Bank Alaska, Denali Bancorp Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yukon Maxi-Storage, Gerald L. Bowers, Bowers General Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Courtney Motley v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15253
Defendant / Appellee:
COLE, AC, WERNER ALEXANDER, CHRISTOPHER EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY MOTLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sarah Waters, et al v. Cricket Wireless, LLC
as 21-15055
Plaintiff:
LYSHA ENCARNACION, JERMAIN THOMAS, TAMMIE BARNES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARAH WATERS
Defendant / Appellant:
CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC
Masa Warden v. Bryan Cowan, et al
as 20-17405
Defendant / Appellant:
NICK WEAVER and BRYAN COWAN
Defendant:
WILL WILLIAMS and ROGER MOORE, Chief of Police
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MASA NATHANIEL WARDEN
Willie Weaver v. CSP, Folsom
as 20-73308
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT FOLSOM
Petitioner:
WILLIE WEAVER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
