Cases 11 - 20 of 320
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC. v. Bonta
as 24-271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Doe 1, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Chapman
as 23-3515
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KHADIJAH X. CHAPMAN
EGAE, LLC v. Fudge, et al.
as 23-3489
Not Yet Classified:
EGAE, LLC, an Alaska limited liability company, MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, a Delaware statutory trust and MIDCAP FUNDING INVESTMENT X, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA FUDGE, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
In re DMCA Subpoena to X Corp. dba Twitter
as 3:2023mc80294
In Re:
In re DMCA Subpoena to X Corp. dba Twitter
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
X Corp. dba Twitter
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Rene A. Polanco et al
as 2:2023cv09314
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Rene A. Polanco, Fernando Torres and Does I through X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alfred McZeal v. Redwood Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv08540
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr
Defendant:
Redwood Holdings, LLC, Manual Rodriguez, Does 1 through 10 and others
Petitioner:
DOES 1 through X, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HateAid gGmbH et al
as 4:2023mc80235
Petitioner:
HateAid gGmbH, Ballon Josephine and Grinberg Avital
Respondent:
Twitter International Unlimited Company (TIUC) and X CORP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
