Cases 21 - 30 of 430
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Greenwood v. Pierce County Municipality, et al.
as 23-3497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT MICHAEL GREENWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, J SLOTHOWER, HSA, RN, MIGUEL BALDERRAMA, MD and others
Dangaard et al v. Instagram, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dangaard, Kelly Gilbert, Jennifer Allbaugh and others
Defendant:
Instagram, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC, Fenix Intrnet LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pierce v. District of Montana - Butte
as 23-3362
Petitioner:
ROBERT S. PIERCE
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF MONTANA - BUTTE
Not Classified By Court:
JIM SALMONSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv02935
Plaintiff:
Elissa M. Roberts, James Everett Hunt, Juan Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Scott Sandell, Mary A. Ayotte, Eddy Zervigon and others
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Forsberg and Ronald M. Kruse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Barbara Robinson v. Pierce County
as 23-35532
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY
Gold v. US Bancorp et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Bismarck, North Dakota et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
City of Bismarck, North Dakota, Dickey County, North Dakota, Foster County, North Dakota and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
