Cases 21 - 30 of 1,080
Zaragoza, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA "VICKY" ZARAGOZA, an individual, F.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Gilbert Zaragoza, an individual and L.S.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Nancy Gonzalez an individual
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal entity, Deputy DAVID ANDERSON, #5097 and DOES, 2-10, Inclusive
E.J.T. v. County of Jefferson, et al.
as 24-1717
Plaintiff:
E.J.T., a minor, by and through his Conservator, InTRUSTment Northwest, Inc.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, a public body, TYLER W. ANDERSON, in his individual capacity and ARJANG ARYANFARD, in his individual capacity
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Galina Vugman v. Alteryx, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Galina Vugman
Defendant:
Alteryx, Inc., Dean Stoecker, Mark Anderson and others
Weird Science LLC et al v. Rene Sindlev et al
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Weird Science LLC and William Anderson Wittekind
Defendant:
Rene Sindlev, Mark Dybul, Gregg Alton and others
Augustus v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
KARL AUGUSTUS
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHEL MOORE, Chief, ROBERT OLMOS, Sergeant and others
Michael Green v. Jason Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Jason Anderson and San Bernardino County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN MARIE ANDERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Guox Baten, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1285
Petitioner:
GLORIA MAGDONY GUOX BATEN, JOSE FERNANDO AZ GUOX and ANDERSON OMAR AZ GUOX
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
