Cases 21 - 30 of 334
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Yuen et al v. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04297
Plaintiff:
Cam Yuen, Arrianna Garcia, Kathryn Heberling and others
Defendant:
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and IDEXX Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clarke v. Meyer et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Kevin Meyer, Shelley Hughes, Tom Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Equate Media, Inc. et al v. Leonard Aguilar et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Defendant:
Eric Conces, Leonard Aguilar, Alex Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Equate Media, Inc., Budget Van Lines, Inc., Quote Runner, LLC and others
Janis Wolf v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado
as 22-15233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANIS WOLF, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CARPENTER, HAZLEWOOD, DELGADO & BOLEN, LLP
United States of America v. Carpenter
as 2:2022mc00034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carissa Carpenter
Federal Trade Commission v. Itmedia Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Itmedia Solutions LLC, DEV.XYZ LLC, TEAM.XYZ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
USA v. Carpenter
as 2:2022mc00002
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carissa Carpenter
Petitioner:
Morgan Stanley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
