Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guthridge v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
as 2:2011cv00162
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Guthridge
Counter_claimant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Counter_defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eric Drew v. Equifax Information Services,, et al
as 11-15008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC ROBERT DREW
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, CITIGROUP, CHASE BANK USA and others
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS, FLEET CREDIT CARD SERVICES and others
Eric Drew v. Equifax Information Services,, et al
as 10-17897
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ERIC ROBERT DREW
Defendant - Appellant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS, FLEET CREDIT CARD SERVICES and others
Mordecal v. Citibank South Dakota, N.A. et al
as 3:2010cv05714
Plaintiff:
Denise Mordecal
Defendant:
Citibank South Dakota, N.A. and Law Office of Harris & Zide
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scalise v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
as 6:2010cv06375
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Scalise
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gustavo Bajana v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv07170
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Bajana
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. and DOES
Lynn Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv06841
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. and Does
Plaintiff:
Lynn Nelson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04930
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
