Cases 21 - 30 of 122
(PS) Maxey v. Brown, et al
as 2:2014cv02206
Defendant:
Sacramento County District Attorneys Office, Benjamin Wagner, William Jefferson Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonya Jackson v. United States of America, et al.
as 2:2014cv06197
Defendant:
Eric Holder and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Sonya Jackson
California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms et al
as 1:2014at00566
Plaintiff:
California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, Eric Holder and B Todd Jones
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, et al
as 1:2014cv01211
Plaintiff:
California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Eric Holder and B Todd Jones
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Cohen v. Holder
as 3:2014cv01609
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aaron Cohen
Defendant:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Singh v. Crawford et al
as 1:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Major Singh
Defendant:
Jonathan Crawford and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chow v. Holder et al
as 3:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Siu San Chow
Defendant:
Eric Holder , Jeh Johnson and Lori Scialabba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lugo v. Holder
as 4:2013cv02108
Plaintiff:
Ines Lugo
Defendant:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Randhawa v. Crawford et al
as 1:2013cv01896
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Randhawa
Defendant:
Jonathan Crawford and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
RANDHAWA v. Crawford et al
as 1:2013at00842
Plaintiff:
AMANDEEP RANDHAWA
Defendant:
Jonathan Crawford and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
