Cases 21 - 30 of 1,114
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-2219
Defendant:
AMY BRAEUNINGER, DON at W.C.J, JAMIE LOKE, Corrections Officer at Washington County jail (W.C.J.), HARMONY JONES, Corrections Officer at W.C.J. and others
Plaintiff:
AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Morrison v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-2127
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORRISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KALA MCKINNEY, JOHN GRINSELL and others
Webb v. Miller-Saltarello, et al.
as 24-2094
Plaintiff:
REUBEN WEBB
Defendant:
HEIDI MILLER-SALTARELLO, TIA BULLOCK, CARRIE COFFEY and others
Jutla et al v. Redfin Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Rajninder Raven Jutla and In Love Properties LLC
Defendant:
Redfin Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-1000
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Deng v. Henry, et al.
as 24-1960
Plaintiff:
TONY DENG
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HENRY, Deputy Warden, Cook Unit, ROCKY SUTTON, CO IV, UNKNOWN BARNES, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Solid State Lighting Hawaii, LLC v. Dos Santos et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Solid State Lighting Hawaii, LLC
Defendant:
Dionne Dos Santos, Hawaii Lighting Associates LLC, San Diego Lighting Associates, Inc. and others
Doe 1, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Sanchez v. County of Graham, et al.
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SANCHEZ, an adult individual
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GRAHAM, a government entity, PJ ALLRED, Graham County Sheriff, a government officer/jural entity, ARTHUR PEREZ, JR., husband and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
