Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Roe v. Intellicorp Records, Inc
as 3:2012cv02567
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Intellicorp Records, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roe v. Sutter Health et al
as 2:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Sutter Health, Sutter VNA & Hospice and Timothy Gieseke
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Locricchio et al v. Continental Investment Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv00710
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Locricchio , James Slemons and Jim Slemons Hawaii Inc.
Defendant:
Continental Investment Company Ltd., Tony Honda Auto, Car Stereo Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Sung-Yuen Wong v. Richard Roe et al
as 2:2010cv03673
Defendant:
Jane Roe and Richard Roe
Plaintiff:
Sung-Yuen Wong
Ricky Pickett v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv03955
Defendant:
Fred Aguiar, Ken Allen, Parole Agent Almazon and others
Movant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Ricky Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leegin Creative v. Ayama Industrial Co, et al
as 2:2000cv12708
ThirdParty Defendant:
7 West Accessories Inc, Fine Watches Inc, Ring-A-Levio Inc and others
Defendant:
7 West Accessories Inc, ABC Companies, Ayama Industrial Company LTD and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ABC Companies, Belts By Nadim Inc, Jane Does and others
Counter Defendant:
ABC Companies Roes, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Belts By Nadim Inc and Ring-A-Levio Inc
Plaintiff:
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Borton & Sons Inc v. Washington Apple Distributing Service et al
as 2:2007cv03054
Plaintiff:
Borton & Sons Inc
Defendant:
Washington Apple Distributing Service, Melvin R King, Jr, Jane Doe King and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
