Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Sacramento Suburban Water District v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03433
Plaintiff: Sacramento Suburban Water District
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
County of Tulare v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02155
Plaintiff: County of Tulare
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sacramento Suburban Water District v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2009at01990
Plaintiff: Sacramento Suburban Water District
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03133
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS Ag and others
Plaintiff: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Anschutz Corporation v. Merryll Lynch & Co., Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03780
Plaintiff: The Anschutz Corporation, The Anschutz Corporation, The Anschutz Corporation and others
Defendant: Merryll Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Louisiana Pacific Corporation v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment Dealer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03529
Plaintiff: Louisiana Pacific Corporation, Louisiana Pacific Corporation, Louisiana Pacific Corporation and others
Defendant: Money Market 1 Institutional Investment Dealer, Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc., Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Vanessa Simmonds v. Merrill Lynch & CO Inc, et al
as 09-35375
Plaintiff - Appellee: VANESSA SIMMONDS
Defendant: MERRILL LYNCH & CO INC
Defendant - Appellant: MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
Vanessa Simmonds v. Merrill Lynch & CO Inc, et al
as 09-35282
Plaintiff - Appellant: VANESSA SIMMONDS
Defendant: MERRILL LYNCH & CO INC
Defendant - Appellee: FINISAR CORPORATION, Nominal Defendant, a Delaware corporation, MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
T. Jeffrey Simpson, et al v. Homestore.Com, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2001cv11115
Defendant: AOL Time Warner Inc, Akonix Systems Inc, Cendant Corporation and others
Movant: Matt L Brody
Plaintiff: California State Teachers Retirement System and T Jeffrey Simpson
Objector: Josephine Drucker, Ronald K Drucker and Steven F Helfand
Intervenor: Wade Koehmstedt, Merrill Lynch & Co Inc, Daniel Musso and others
Acquired By Semotu: WizShop.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
IBEW Local 103 v. Indymac MBS, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01520
Plaintiff: IBEW Local 103, IBEW Local 103, IBEW Local 103 and others
Defendant: Goldman, Sachs & Co., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Goldman, Sachs & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?