Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Asset Management Fund et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04775
Plaintiff: AMF Intermediate Mortgage Fund, AMF Short U.S. Government Fund, AMF U.S. Government Mortgage Fund and others
Defendant: Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc. and others
Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv04316
Defendant: Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Consol Defendant: Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., CWABS, Inc., Credit Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC and others
Consol Plaintiff: Principal Funds, Inc., Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Variable Contracts Funds, Inc.
Principal Life Insurance Company et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04317
Defendant: Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Principal Funds, Inc., Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Variable Contracts Funds, Inc.
Quesada et al-v-Bank of America Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01703
Plaintiff: Elwood Quesada and James DeRosa
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation and Banc of America Investment Services, Inc. nka Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vermont Pension Investment Com, et al v. Goldman Sachs & Co., et al
as 11-15087
: In re: WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE-BACKED CERTIFICATES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: VERMONT PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, POLICEMEN'S ANNUITY & BENEFIT FUND OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant - Appellee: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., JP MORGAN SECURITIES, INC., as successor-in-interest to Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC. and others
General Retirement System of t v. Goldman Sachs & Co., et al
as 10-17647
: In re: WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE-BACKED CERTIFICATES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., JP MORGAN SECURITIES, INC., as successor-in-interest to Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC. and others
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03039
Plaintiff: Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. , Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc. , DB Structured Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smith v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2010cv00433
Plaintiff: Edward Smith
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association, Daniel H. Mudd, Robert T. Blakely and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Maine State Retirement System v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00302
Other: Broderick CDO 2 Ltd., Florida West Funding LLC, Ellington Management Group, LLC and others
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Bank of America Corp., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Petitioner: Vermont Pension Investment Committee, Operating Engineers Annuity Plan, Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System and others
Plaintiff: Maine State Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Mark Rossel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv06902
Petitioner: Mark Rossel, Mark Rossel and Mark Rossel
Respondent: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?