Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Alexey Kharis v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 19-15000
Respondent: DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff-Coroner of Contra Costa County, Responsible for Contra Costa West County Detension Facility
Undetermined: DAVID JENNINGS, in his Official Capacity as Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her Official Capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Moujtahid et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01789
Plaintiff: Jay Gairson, Badr Moujtahid, Fatima Moujtahid and others
Defendant: L Francis Cissna, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, National Records Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MG2 Corporation et al v. Baran et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01801
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kathy A. Baran and others
Plaintiff: MG2 Corporation and Bharath Raj Kumanan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Al Baali v. Nielsen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02213
Plaintiff: Safwat Ahmed Muhi Al Baali
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security, US Attorney for the District of Nevada, US Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Vega Barocio v. Nielsen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv06864
Defendant: James Wyrough, Sec. Kirstjen Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna
Plaintiff: Evangelina Vega Barocio
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01122
Plaintiff: AFSHIN RAGHEBI, OneAmerica, MALAYEEN AHMED and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of State, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
J.M.C.B., et al v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35744
Plaintiff - Appellant: J.M.C.B., N.G.R., L.R.V. and others
Defendant - Appellee: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and DONALD W. NEUFELD, Associate Director, Service Center Operations, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Zander Ramat v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al
as 18-56190
Plaintiff - Appellant: ZANDER RAMAT
Defendant - Appellee: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, MELISSA MAXIM, Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, San Diego and others
Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16465
Plaintiff - Appellee: ESTEBAN ALEMAN GONZALEZ and EDUARDO GUTIERREZ SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellant: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice and others
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 18-72159
: In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Petitioner: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest: RYAN KARNOSKI, CATHRINE SCHMID, D.L. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?