Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 63
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant: United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56377
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection et al v. Consumer Advocacy Center Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv01998
Defendant: Tuong Nguyen, Albert Kim, Kaine Wen and others
Receiver: Thomas W McNamara
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, The People of the State of California and others
Petitioner: Edu Doc Support, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of California et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv06013
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Nevada, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant: DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of Oregon et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 6:2019cv00316
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?